Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update otel sdk to v1.16.0/v0.39.0 #2261

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

@frzifus frzifus self-assigned this Jul 12, 2023
@frzifus frzifus requested review from iblancasa and rubenvp8510 and removed request for iblancasa July 12, 2023 13:18
@frzifus frzifus enabled auto-merge (squash) July 12, 2023 13:20
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 12, 2023

@frzifus: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/jaeger-e2e-tests 40c3da5 link true /test jaeger-e2e-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@frzifus
Copy link
Member Author

frzifus commented Jul 12, 2023

/retest

@frzifus
Copy link
Member Author

frzifus commented Jul 12, 2023

Signed-off-by: Benedikt Bongartz <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 12, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: frzifus, iblancasa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 87.50% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (cbd285d) 87.63% compared to head (0571c8e) 87.63%.

❗ Current head 0571c8e differs from pull request most recent head 25de958. Consider uploading reports for the commit 25de958 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2261   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.63%   87.63%           
=======================================
  Files         100      100           
  Lines        6956     6957    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         6096     6097    +1     
  Misses        656      656           
  Partials      204      204           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/metrics/bootstrap.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/metrics/instances.go 89.56% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

}
observer.ObserveInt64(i.Gauge, int64(count), attrs...)
opt := metric.WithAttributes(
attribute.Key(i.Label).String(key),
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me check if that makes sense. Even if, we should rename key I guess ^^

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, seems to be the same.

before:

// String creates a KeyValue with a STRING Value type.
func String(k, v string) KeyValue {
	return Key(k).String(v)
}

After:

func (k Key) String(v string) KeyValue {
	return KeyValue{
		Key:   k,
		Value: StringValue(v),
	}
}

@frzifus frzifus disabled auto-merge July 12, 2023 13:59
@frzifus frzifus merged commit d76d8cd into jaegertracing:main Jul 12, 2023
@frzifus frzifus deleted the update_otel branch July 12, 2023 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants